In the past three weeks we have been overwhelmed with images of religious groups descending upon the island of Haiti, uniting religious solidarity and aid, most often in the name of Jesus Christ. From Pat Robertson’s Operation Blessing distributing food and water in Port-Au-Prince to Christian Scientists working side by side with US doctors in the many makeshift hospitals that now dot the capital, to the dramatic arrest of ten Southern Baptist Missionaries accused of kidnapping, these images beg the question of the connection between aid and evangelization. And, perhaps more harshly, these incidents force us to wonder if the “good” these groups bring is outweighed by the manner in which their ignorance is a destructive force in the global South.
The current North American missionary wave—often in the guise of aid—is not new to the Caribbean and Latin America. The twentieth century is marked particularly by the increased presence of Protestant denominations in traditionally Roman Catholic countries. Haiti is no exception. These North American missionary groups, both Roman Catholic and Protestant, bring US cultural Christian values, along with their food, medicine, textbooks, and able hands ready to build schools, clinics, and homes for the poor. Ultimately they impose a worldview upon populations, remaining blissfully unaware of the cultural, historical, and religious intricacies of the countries they visit.
Theological Tourism
In addition to the traditional missionary formula, there has been an increase in the past decade of what are known as “immersion trips,” yet another form of Christian imperialism (otherwise known as theological tourism) south of the Rio Grande. Universities and churches assemble groups of eager participants to descend upon countries full of poor people that need the help and money the United States provides. Participants “immerse” themselves in the concrete lives of poor people, feeling that after a week (!) of living alongside a community they understand and know what is best for these poor populations.
For two years I lived in San Lucas Tolimán, a predominantly Mayan town in the Highlands of Guatemala. For those years I volunteered at the Roman Catholic Mission and its various outreach projects to the local Mayan community. Spearheaded by Fr. Greg Schaffer, a Minnesotan Roman Catholic priest who has spent close to fifty years living in and struggling with the community, the vision underlying the Mission is the empowerment of the local Mayan community. Projects such as Fair Trade coffee, land redistribution, education, health care, and reforestation dominate the Mission’s work, which is led by a collective of local Mayan leaders. In addition, there is an extensive volunteer program for groups and individuals from the United States whose ultimate goal is cultivating global solidarity. My husband, a native of San Lucas who was head of the groups and volunteers for five years, handled the two to three thousand North Americans that came from churches and schools across the United States in order to provide financial and physical aid to the Mission’s projects.
I met my husband when I descended upon San Lucas as the faculty leader of an eager group of undergraduates who, fueled by the mission of our Jesuit University and the readings of Latin American liberation theology I had given them, were ready to save the poor. Years later, when I lived in San Lucas and served as a quasi-host for similar groups, I cringed at their comments about “the happy poor” who smiled in spite of their suffering, the candy they would give toothless children whose families could not afford toothpaste, and who often declared that all Guatemala needed was some American motivation and technology to move ahead. I would also constantly remind smug North Americans that while the aid they brought was significant, the money they spent on their trip to “experience” the poor could have fed a family of ten in this local community.
I do not want to devalue the importance of these trips or the need to cultivate global solidarity. I also do not want to question the good intentions of the thousands of individuals whom I met over the years. Without the commitment and money of individuals from the United States the Mission could never have built homes for thousands of families, supported close to thirty schools, or created an infrastructure in this community. And yet the smugness with which some leave San Lucas, that self-satisfaction of “making a difference,” is like a thorn in my side—for what we all have come to know is that such immersion experiences affect the visitor much more than the resident who is left behind.
Mini-Messiahs
I am bringing a group of eager undergrads to San Lucas next month. Clearly I see the value of these trips. Yet I am bringing a group who has studied Guatemalan culture, religion, and politics. This preparation will not control the individual reaction, yet can contextualize it. I can remind them that the iPods and brand name clothing they wear can create a sense of longing in a community that would not necessarily know such luxuries exist so readily. I can also remind them of the true impact, both negative and positive, of their presence. And more importantly, I can make them aware that we are not here to save a people but work side by side with individuals to slowly empower a community.
What do college immersion trips have to do with Baptists accused of kidnapping? Everything. For the attitude that has dominated mission work in Haiti, that we can somehow, even in our ignorance, save people from poverty—like mini-Messiahs incarnating briefly in their lands—can become the prevailing ethos in all intercultural exchange, no matter how well-intentioned.
Over sixty Roman Catholic Churches collapsed in the earthquake in Haiti, killing over one hundred nuns and priests. As the Haitian Catholic Church tries to rebuild, it worries about how the Haitian exodus to rural provinces (where, in some cases, Protestant denominations are more entrenched) will affect the future of Catholicism in this nation. International money and support will flood into Haiti on behalf of every Christian denomination that has ever had a foothold there, especially as communities go through the work of rebuilding. This aid is desperately needed, along with the presence of aid workers, yet the imperialist attitude that generally accompanies this mission work, this idea that we are “saving the poor,” must be checked at the door. Or at the very least, on the way out.
Tags: christian, haiti, ignorance, imperialism, missionaries







"Over sixty Roman Catholic Churches collapsed in the earthquake in Haiti, killing over one hundred nuns and priests. As the Haitian Catholic Church tries to rebuild, it worries about how the Haitian exodus to rural provinces — where in some cases Protestant denominations are more entrenched — will affect the future of Catholicism in this nation."
Thank you for this fine article.
yea this story hits some points, but it is not tellin the whole story. It doesn't have the scope like the detail/motivation behind her money dealings juicy juicy juicy check it out
http://bit.ly/cashkids
...lots of photo ops for wealthy film stars here. Maybe a few judicious Tone 40 exercises will clear away some rubble.
When ever i talk or write something about Haiti falling my tear and i am upset ...Muscle Might
Thanks for this fine article and clear insight. You comment that aid and ignorance often go hand in hand. Some of that is inadvertent ignorance. In the early 1970's in Viet Nam, aid groups such as the YMCA for which I volunteered, were often the recipients of foodstuffs like graham crackers and Campbell's tomato soup - things which inevitably could not be used; or concentrated milk bars - which caused serious diarrhea in refugees who had often been without food for days.
Then there was what I call wilful ignorance. During that same period, so-called "orphans" were also taken out of the country by religious people who claimed to be well-meaning. It only got world-wide notice when a plane load carrying "orphans" out of the country crashed on takeoff. Investigation demonstrated that many of the children had become separated from their parents during evacuation of villages, and were later reunited with family.
Religious people who will be dishonest in their dealings, in order to gain some more "scalps" for their version of "Christ", are not Christian at all. Jesus would, quite frankly, be appalled.
We lived and worked in Viet Nam for the last three years of the war. At the end of that time I could not have said I understood what was needed, but that I had scratched the surface and had some idea.
I read an article about this earlier, but there was no place to make comments. So I'll make one here since it's related.
The article made the point that a mental health crisis is brewing in Haiti, and the proported solution was to send lots of mental health professionals down there.
My suggestion: The people of Haiti have a rich culture and many traditional ways of dealing with death, tragedy, and trauma. For example, there is the "nine nights" tradition of honoring the dead. So instead of sending mental health workers down there with their own agenda, ask the people what they need to carry out their own traditions for honoring the dead and dealing with tragedy / trauma. Do they need a safe meeting place? Transportation, provisions, and security for their traditional (voodou) religious leaders? Certain foods or other substances? Other provisions for their traditional cultural practices?
The Christians may not want to provide cases of florida water or a live pig for a ceremonial feast or meals and transportation for a voodoo priest/ess, calling such practices satanic. They'd rather force their own ways on the people. But these practices are not satanic; they're the legitimate traditional practices of a people, practices which have helped the people maintain their resiliance and sanity through centuries of almost unimaginable hardship.
In addition to financial gifts I'm also offering prayers for Haiti. I'm praying first and last to the Gatekeeper to open the ways so that the resources coming in get to where they are needed and get used well, and that those crossing the great river find their way safely over. If you're so inclined, please join in this prayer.
Thanks for a fine article. Turns out I was leading a group to San Lucas last August when you were there as well. Fr. Greg gets it right. And I think, as a leader of groups to Guatemala, changing participants is a primary goal. To believe that I can change the lives of the Mayans is just another form of colonialism, but believing that I can help change the lives of those I take down is one of the only goals I can take on. It's middle class culture I get, and Mayan culture(s) from which I am trying to learn.
Reading such things is really sad thing :(
I hope for better for these children.
--
regards
acheter
"Mini-messiahs" and colonialism. Often an accurate characterization of feel-good theo-tourism. But, as Michelle wrote, if we go with a right focus (not to save, but to empower - not to make them like us, but as catalysts of certain freedoms) such trips can be a net positive for all involved. Being poor is not a problem by itself. Not having access to clean water, adequate nutrition, reasonable health care, and shelter from the elements is.
When we embark on such a trip, we should expect to be personally challenged and changed for good - bringing back to our own communities a greater sense of simple living, giving, loving unconditionally, and working in community to better the lives of all. We may have been catalysts for good in a far-off land, but ultimately if we personally are not profoundly changed for good our visit has missed a great opportunity.
Comments closed
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.