ReligionDispatches.org

Queen Esther: Image credit: Lilian Broca

The Passionate Torah: Sex and Judaism
Danya Ruttenberg, editor
NYU Press, 2009

Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg has spent much of her career writing about Judaism. Her first book, Yentl’s Revenge (2001), is a collection that features young women writing about how they have reconciled their faith and their feminist beliefs, and explores topics like marriage, body image, transgender theory, and environmentalism in order to redefine Judaism for a younger generation of women.

Ruttenberg followed up Yentl’s Revenge last year by releasing a spiritual memoir about her own coming of age journey: Surprised by God: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Religion. From the decision to be an atheist when she was 13 years old to her ultimate, though somewhat reluctant, choice to become a rabbi, Ruttenberg’s story shows the ways religious practice is complicated yet valuable for its complexity. This month she will release a third, perhaps more controversial, book entitled The Passionate Torah: Sex and Judaism.

Like Yentl’s Revenge, The Passionate Torah is an anthology. The book’s contributor list includes “some of today’s smartest Jewish thinkers who explore a broad range of fundamental questions in an effort to balance ancient tradition and modern sexuality.” The Passionate Torah aims to “bridge the gap between the sacred and the sexual.”

I recently spoke to Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg about the challenges of bringing new perspectives on sexuality and feminism to the forefront of Judaism.

I went to my first Passover seder this year and was interested to learn that part of the tradition includes theological argument! Do you see this book as a continuation of that tradition of debate?

I absolutely see this book as engaged in the classically Jewish art of not only argumentation and debate, but intellectual experimentation. There are about 5,000 disagreements recorded in the Talmud, and only about 50 are resolved on the page. The sense that there are multiple ways to see every issue is an important aspect of the Jewish tradition. This is part of why the anthology has so many different, often competing voices: it’s meant to be a place for discussion and debate, and there isn’t the presumption that everyone will agree, even a little bit. More than that, often what you see in these “arguments” is that one or both parties are experimenting with ways to approach the issue. One sees, in the Talmud and midrashic (homiletic) sources, the rabbis basically riffing, or jamming. You know, “What if we thought about it this way? Hey, what would happen if we thought about it this way?” That’s really the spirit of The Passionate Torah—a playground of sorts, a way of experimenting with the questions and issues at hand in the hopes that something new and exciting will result.

The academic tone of this book is a pretty big departure from your two previous books, a personal narrative anthology and a memoir, respectively. What prompted this shift?

I think the material itself demanded a more rigorous approach. I wanted to take a good, hard look at what is, and what could be, in terms of Jewish thinking about sex and sexuality. In order to do this, I needed people who absolutely knew their stuff, who could bring out the big guns both in terms of Jewish text and tradition, but also in terms of innovative thinking about gender, sex, and sexuality, who could marry a number of different lenses to create something new. It’s not a strictly academic work by any means; it’s meant to be accessible to people with all sorts of (and no) Jewish backgrounds—hence the glossary in the back. But yeah, there are footnotes.

For someone not well-versed in Jewish feminist theory, how transgressive or radical are these essays?

Some of them push the envelope, to be sure. Sarra Lev’s suggestion, for example, that we read part of the text known as the Oral Torah to some (specifically, the Mishnah from tractate Sotah) as pornography is sure to ruffle a few feathers, and Naomi Seidman’s piece is sure to provoke in a different direction, suggesting that the segregation of the sexes found in traditional/Orthodox Judaism (and reviled by many Jewish feminists) is a site of profound, unarticulated homoeroticism. Laura Levitt makes a Jewish case against marriage, and possibly monogamy. Jay Michaelson suggests that queerness should implicate everyone’s theology, and Elliot Kukla looks at the ways in which classical rabbinic literature was surprisingly encouraging of intersex love relationships. There’s definitely plenty that, I hope, will challenge readers on a lot of different levels.

How did you choose these essays for this collection?

I wanted pieces that were saying things that I haven’t heard said before, that were making a new case or asking us to rethink our old ideas in some sort of surprising way. I wanted pieces that were simultaneously respectful of the tradition and felt entirely empowered to critique it. I wanted pieces that might offer us some sort of insight for the ongoing project of building a Judaism that, while rooted in history, can grow and change and both continue to challenge us and reflect our highest values. I wanted essays, in other words, that kicked my own butt a little bit.

I found the story of Rahab quite interesting (as did many of your contributors—quite a few of them utilize it in their analysis). Who would have thought that Pretty Woman had its roots in Judaism? Why is this such a compelling story?

The tale of a gentile prostitute who hides Israelite spies so that they can conquer the land is pretty ripe for reading, isn’t it? It has, over time, evoked so many different tropes: the hooker with a heart of gold, the righteous gentile, the redeemed ‘fallen woman’, the colonized woman colluding with her colonizers, etc. According to some midrashim (rabbinic homilies), she converted to Judaism; so there she is portrayed as the woman who went from the depths of depravity to the heights of piety. Her foreignness and her sexuality are exoticized, feared, deplored, considered titillating. There’s a lot to say, and so much of what has been said by the rabbis is so deeply troubling that there remains, for us, plenty more to say.

Tags: feminism, identity, jewish culture, judaism, lgbt, mandy van deven, marriage, queer theory, sexuality, theology

Related Stories

Jesus Loses His Freak: How I Lost One Leper Messiah, and Gained Another
By Mark Dery

Some Good Old Fraud, for a Change
By Arri Eisen

Brooks Misreads Niebuhr
By Daniel Schultz