Undercover at Falwell’s Liberty University, Finding Common Ground
By Nathan Schneider
June 4, 2009
  • 8 Comments
  • Print

Brown sophomore Kevin Roose, an Ivy-league heathen, infiltrated the nation’s holiest university and emerged a changed man—not committed to conservative Christianity, but to finding a new language for reconciliation.

Roose undercover at Liberty University

The Unlikely Disciple: A Sinner’s Semester at America’s Holiest University
Kevin Roose
Grand Central Publishing, 2009

A couple of months ago, I went back to visit Brown University, where I graduated from college in 2006. While waiting for a meeting in Providence’s new Freemason-themed hotel, I got a surprise phonecall from Father Isaac, the cassocked gentle giant who serves as Eastern Orthodox chaplain there. We hadn’t known each other well while I was a student, but I’d always liked him. Upon hearing I was in town, he thought he’d ring me up, and what followed was certainly the longest conversation we’d ever had together. He wished me well, but much more, he thanked God in a dozen different ways for the small miracle that, at Brown of all places, I had managed to be a Christian.

Brown’s no fratty party school, but to cultural conservatives, it’s even worse. While I was there, Bill O’Reilly did a segment on the notorious “SexPowerGod” dance that the Queer Alliance put on each year (in addition to the springtime edition, “Starfuck”). I lived in the co-ops that got Ivy-League naked parties started in the 1980s. What really drives people like Father Isaac up the wall, though, is the perception that, after these nights of debauchery, students’ heads are filled (by liberal professors) with all the post-everything “theory” they need to make it all seem like exactly what a liberated, ambitious young person with tip-top SAT scores should do.

It was from this world that Kevin Roose, then a sophomore at Brown, set off to spend a semester at Jerry Falwell’s arch-fundamentalist Liberty University in 2007. He went as an aspiring writer, a disciple of immersion journalist (and Brown alum) A.J. Jacobs, author of The Year of Living Biblically. Liberty was a gonzo experiment: get as far as you can from your comfort zone and write about it, if you live to tell the tale. What was most unsettling of all about the trip, though, is that he actually liked it there.

Like me, Roose was happy at Brown. We each ventured into religious underworlds partly to see if the culture war between the O’Reillys and our liberal parents was really all they made it out to be. Reading Roose’s tender and endearing account of his time at Liberty, The Unlikely Disciple (published in March by Grand Central), I could feel the ground moving under me. It bespeaks a shift in the way the cultural Left is coming to deal with conservative evangelicalism. No longer is the other, it seems, such a mortal threat that we can’t all make friends and get along.

Walking Down Liberty Way

Liberty University rests in the fundamentalist garrison town of Lynchburg, Virginia; Jerry Falwell’s home. His Thomas Road Baptist Church began there in 1956, and it is now a full-blown megachurch of more than 20,000 members. Founded in 1971, Liberty set out to bring the reactionary Bible-college experience to the born-again mainstream.

It’s a liberal arts school, though any dissent from political and social conservatism is subject to punishment. The required freshman science class is a crash-course in creationism. R-rated movies, kissing, drinking, uncleanliness, dancing, and profanity can all warrant fines and lead to expulsion. While by no means a leading institution by national standards, its graduates enjoyed disproportionate favor in the hiring practices of the last Bush administration. Falwell, who led the school until its death and is adored by its students, crafted Liberty as an extension of his decades-long blitz on American politics and culture.

Roose tried to do his homework before he arrived. He read C.S. Lewis’ apologetic works and Susan Harding’s classic study of the Lynchburg scene, The Book of Jerry Falwell. A Christian friend tutored him in some of the jargon. He decided to go undercover; to his new friends at Liberty, Roose said he had recently accepted Jesus as his personal savior. Nobody there guessed that he was not really among the elect.

His family of liberal, secular Quakers serve as the Jiminy Cricket on Roose’s adventure. His parents live in fear that he’ll fall victim to the fundamentalist machine. From time to time his lesbian aunts write to remind him of all the terrible things Falwell and his ilk have to say about folks like them. As he settles into life at Liberty, singing in the church choir, making friends in his dorm, and coming to appreciate no-touch dating, hearing from family comes less as a welcome reminder of his true self than as nagging.

Through a mix of personal moxie and unbelievable luck, Roose had quite the semester. For spring break, he joined a busload of Liberty students on a missionary vacation, “witnessing” to their godless peers at Daytona Beach, Florida. He held his own in Bible studies and received counseling for his masturbation habit. And, on behalf of the school newspaper, he landed a rare one-on-one interview with Jerry Falwell himself. When Falwell died just before the semester’s end, Roose won the distinction of being the last print journalist to interview the former Moral Majority kingpin. Perhaps most miraculous of all, though: when Roose returned to campus after writing his book, he didn’t get clobbered. Nobody seemed to mind that he had been lying and spying all along.

For all his immersive enthusiasm, despite praying and proselytizing and Bible-thumping with the best of them, Roose didn’t give in all the way. He didn’t get “saved.” His interior monologue never got too comfortable with the endless homophobia that passes for ordinary conversation among Liberty students, though he also fell short of speaking out against it at the time. When he returned, he was still a happy, post-everything Brown student. But he was still praying, even if not quite believing.

We’re meant to gather that the experience was something he’d always fondly take with him, like “the world’s easiest metaphor”: the ineradicable residue of the Jesus fish that he kept on the back of his car while in Lynchburg. He may not ultimately subscribe to the Liberty Way, but he can at least grow through his encounter with it. “Religious conflict might be a basic human instinct,” writes Roose, “but I have faith, now more than ever before, that we can subvert that instinct for long enough to listen to each other.”

The Art of the Exposé

When I was at Brown, a few years ahead of Roose, I made it my business to learn how to mix my dual compulsions of writing and religiosity. A fit of divine grace had turned me into a baptized Catholic by the Spring of my freshman year, but I clung to secular social and intellectual habits alongside intense, private piety. Like Roose at Liberty, my time at Brown was between two worlds, and I valued them both.

In those days, religious “values voters” were swinging the 2004 election in favor of George W. Bush. Everything going wrong in politics, from the invasion of Iraq, to the sidelining of climate science, to the obsession with Terri Schiavo, seemed to come down to theological delusion. Much of the best religion writing I could find was out to expose the troubling truths about the religious right. Jeff Sharlet was infiltrating “America’s secret theocrats” in my hometown of Arlington, Virginia and Ted Haggard’s New Life Church in Colorado Springs. Laurie Goodstein and David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times came to Brown to expose the evangelical organizations targeting the Ivy League.

During my breaks from school, I set off to follow suit. I took off on road trips that mixed pilgrimage with participant observation. By the end, I had spent time at major megachurches, including New Life, Rick Warren’s Saddleback, the Crystal Cathedral, and McLean Bible Church (outside of Washington DC). I became practically a regular at Salt Lake City’s Temple Square and dabbled in every pesky little denomination and congregation and prophecy conference I could find. But I was no good at exposé. The more I saw to expose, the more of the other I could appreciate and make my own. While Sharlet and Goodstein saw a theocratic beast in their midst, I found only crippling ambivalence. In the end, I didn’t write much about those adventures. The red/blue political vocabulary just those few years ago felt unequal to my aspirations for empathy.

When Sharlet’s The Family came out last year, I reviewed it in these pages. It was undeniably an important, penetrating, page-turner of a book, but my essay also ventured into disappointment with the ‘us vs. them’ language that the cultural Left had taken on for talking about religious conservatives. Who was the “we” Sharlet kept using, that I kept trying to use? Were we really so different from them? The ambivalence of my truncated travels got in the way.

Breezing through The Unlikely Disciple, it felt like the language I was searching for at Brown (in the desolate middle of the Bush years) had suddenly arrived. By the time of Roose’s semester and his writing, the president’s approval ratings were in permanent free fall, his nefarious theocratic designs evidently vanquished. In that climate, Roose found ready at hand the language for common ground and the gradient of hope. Sound familiar?

A New Era of Responsibility

Throughout Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and into his administration, he has tried to work his words around the culture wars. He speaks of “abortion reduction” rather than “choice” or “life.” A supposedly new-and-improved faith-based initiatives office stands at the center of the domestic agenda. We press on in Afghanistan and Iraq, even as the president heads to Muslim countries in search of dialogue. Meanwhile, Newsweek has proclaimed “The End of Christian America”; with the Bush administration gone and churchgoing on the decline, perhaps the great, religion-infused culture wars of recent decades are over.

For all my complaints about particular policies, I can understand what sociologist Robert Bellah meant when he wrote of Obama’s inauguration, “This is our moment, this is our time.” Bellah is an old man, but his sentiments resonate in a lot of Millennial-generation hearts. The Unlikely Disciple, then, comes to seem like the expression of a brave new world and, in it, a new way of writing about religion in this country. It’s not the first book of the kind, but it struck me as the first to fall so comfortably into the time and place.

We no longer need (since we are all “we” now) to muckrake and expose the other. Now, the necessary work is understanding, compromise, and shared humanity. These cozy themes have always worked their way into my writing, despite any pretense at restraint. Reading Roose made me wonder, Why not embrace it? Time to put aside the earlier, battle-stations posture of the Bush years and welcome the new, harmonious era of Obama.

The news has stopped me in my tracks. Despite all the fanfare for a new liberal—pardon me, “progressive”—religious movement, the old-guard conservatives are mainly unimpressed by Obama’s new jargon. Not only did his reception at Notre Dame last month enrage pro-life Catholics, it threatened to shatter the fragile truce between conservative bishops and the more freewheeling universities and laity in the Church. Last month, too, Liberty was back in the news for refusing to let the Young Democrats organize on campus. If the culture wars are over, their greatest citadel didn’t get the memo.

Back on his home turf, Roose met with the intransigence of conflict. Letters in the Brown Alumni Magazine expressed “shock” at his sympathy for homophobic Liberty and suggested that, “by the time he gets to be thirty-five or forty, he might know enough to have interesting ideas and be able to express them.”

One way or another, the old battle lines are changing; The Unlikely Disciple is a sign of it. And I’m glad that they are, never having felt I had much of anywhere to stand before. They couldn’t account for Roose’s gratefulness to both Brown and Liberty. But nor will sunny hopes for harmony, which both Roose and I both tend toward, suffice either. The truth, the writer in me hopes, will turn out to be much more interesting.

Tags: catholic, common ground, conserative, education, falwell, liberal, liberty university

Comments
View:
Turn comments off sitewide
Why god Isn't Real

Thankfully Darwin's discovery of evolution completely rules out the possibility that man came from some dirt that a god used to make an image of himself out of, and that woman came from a rib of this dirt-man.

Compare the amount of interlocking data from every applicable scientific field including geology, physics, and even molecular biology, all having observational experiments done, that test and prove the hypotheses of evolution occurring (elevating it to a FACT and a THEORY), with the DISCREDITED FAIRY TALE - a big invisible monster that nobody has ever seen or heard did it.

It is frightening that mass delusions of supernatural beings still exist today. It is the same thing as saying that my invisible fire breathing dragon is more powerful than your multi-headed fire spewing sea monster. So, come around to my way of thinking or I will commit atrocities for it.

Everything from the murderous blood stained Sky Daddy who drowned virtually all humanity and other life, sentenced everyone to leave Utopia after Eve (persuaded by a talking snake) ate a magical apple, had Jonah take a ride in the belly of a whale, ruined the life of Job, told Abraham to murder his own kid, killed all the first born of Egypt, had his chosen people commit genocide on the original inhabitants of Palestine, to letting his own son be nailed to some wood so mankind could party with a ghost - is a FAIRY TALE that humanity needs to reject if we are to see many more generations.

By the way if you are dumb enough to believe that this fable is real; in the Bible, the murder count is God/millions - Devil/zero. Whom would you rather spend time with, a vengeful monster or a fallen angel who thought he had a better way? I am NOT promoting the Devil, just illustrating the craziness in this stupidity.

Hopefully if you were previously deluded, after reading this you will see how foolish you have been. Society needs to accelerate its retreat from worshiping outlandishly absurd fictional psychopathic beings.

There is no middle ground.

RE: Why god Isn't Real

I agree with you, fellow human, humanity does need to accelerate its retreat from the worship of sky-gods if we are to have any hope of long lasting survival.

What you say is supported by observable, discoverable evidence and I certainly appreciate and share your frustration and hatred (sometimes). Your theory is spot on, but your methodology is flawed. This is no way to go about challenging theist opinions. Hostility and outright aggressiveness (even if practiced by the theist community) is not a healthy way to spur debate.

Humans are not dumb, they are precise and calculating--they have just been indoctrinated and socialized since birth. If you were born into a devout Muslim family, you'd probably be a devout Muslim. The tabla rasa concept is not far off.

Religion and adherence to strict orthodox dogma appear to be a natural part of cultural and technological evolution. This cannot be ignored. As more humans wake up to this fact and to the difficult spiritual issues that observation based inquiry brings about, we can expect to see a shift in public opinion--in fact this has already begun.

Forty percent of US Americans do not affiliate with any particular church and/or do not believe in an interventionist deity. While it is not yet safe to come out in the workplace as an nontheist, these are encouraging times and numbers.

If you debate the issue of a theist conception of the world, more doubt and skeptical inquiry will enter the minds and hearts of the theist community. Aggressiveness and hostility will not do our cause any good. Only a debate founded upon rationality, skepticism and mutual respect for our fellow human beings can help bring about an end to the theist segment of our history--a very natural part of human history.

Peace!

RE: Why god Isn't Real

You do not believe in God, therefore evolution must be real. The age old problem is that evolution can't be proved. Your faith in man is much greater than my faith in God. Man always let's people down, but God is not your choice? Get out of the God haters club and choose God! You can't truly live without him.

Thanks

I find your comment "there is no middle ground" to be disingenuous to the work of many people all over the spectrum of the "God Divide". Such a view is a radical, arrogant, and false as Falwell's was when he said that 9/11 happened because America strayed from Christian values.

You only advertise your own ignorance in your post. Calling people "deluded" for doing nothing more than believing in a God is cowardly and idiotic.

Thank you for exposing yourself to be exactly the sort of extremist that Kevin Roose seems to be critiquing in his book.

"America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..."

“As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.” ~ Tripoli of Barbary. Art. 11. - Authored by American diplomat Joel Barlow in 1796, the following treaty was sent to the floor of the Senate, June 7, 1797, where it was read aloud in its entirety and unanimously approved. John Adams, having seen the treaty, signed it and proudly proclaimed it to the Nation.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Please support the following organizations to assure America does not become a theocracy, by keeping religion and politics separate, which will help end hatred, racism, oppression and stop the destruction of this great country Fundamentalist Christians have been trying to destroy !!!


American Humanist Association – http://www.AmericanHumanist.org/

American United for Separation of Church & State - http://www.au.org/

Council for Secular Humanism - http://www.secularhumanism.org/

Freedom From Religion Foundation - http://www.ffrf.org/

Friends Committee on National Legislation - http://www.fcnl.org/

Interfaith Alliance Foundation - http://www.interfaithalliance.org/

Military Religious Freedom Foundation - http://www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org/

Secular Coalition For America - http://www.secular.org/

Liberty U

Liberty is a terrific University. I thank God for it's continued success.

Good book

I really enjoyed Roose's book when I read it recently. As a progressive Christian, I found his balance between outrage at the school's (and sometimes student's) policies around heterosexism, women's roles, the role of works and grace in an individual's faith, etc refreshing. It could have been really easy to write a book about how mindless the students and curriculum was, but he didn't. Instead, he showed the ways in which the students create areas of gray, where opinions not clear cut between liberal/conservative.

A Challenge for Fizzmick

Although I agree with your assessment of the biblical story, I would say this: In light of the findings of science being able to disprove creationisms time stamp, and in light of the fact that most of what makes an atom is 1) empty space and 2) cannot yet be explained what holds it together, I would challenge you to try something.

Ascertain for me with valid proof where your thoughts come from. Where they go. Yes, we can "picture" brain activity during thought processes, but can we yet determine what thought comes from what part of the brain, or even that it does? Is the brain reacting to the thought?

So even if we throw out the Sky Daddy tale and partying with a ghost, there is still an element to life that is fundamentally empty, and yet is that which holds us together as it were, and makes this very conversation possible. I would submit that this rather significant "invisible" is what makes the visible possible, including all the stupid stuff we do to each other in the name of our ego labels.

Login / Signup Join the conversation

Comments closed

The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.