When my partner tells those unfamiliar with Christian evangelicals about his Pentecostal upbringing, his pat description is “everything but the snakes.” This glib remark doesn’t begin to penetrate the depths of a fundamentalist upbringing, but it does open the door to the slew of questions that inevitably follow: Have you ever spoken in tongues? (Only when it quickened my family’s going to Shoney’s for breakfast after church.) Were you allowed to date? (Only when the girls weren’t already dating Jesus.) This type of interrogation usually happens at a party after everyone’s tossed back a few and the conversation turns more intimate.
After all, what is more intimate than asking someone to talk about their breakup with God?
Not That Kind of Girl is a coming of age story that centers on the gradual fading of Carlene Bauer’s love affair with the Lord. Though she claims a particular type of fundamentalism, if I were to rank Bauer’s fundamentalist upbringing on an extremity scale of 1 to 10, I’d likely score it smack dab in the middle. Her non-denominational church was certainly evangelical, putting forth the belief that one must sublimate one’s time, talents, and resources on a ubiquitous quest to, as Saint Paul instructed, die to self.
Bauer’s childhood spiritual guides did their part to fill her with rapture anxiety by screening A Thief in the Night, and her Sunday school instructor effectively scared the children with stories of casting Satan from the foot of her bed with an exorcistic command. But there were no faith healings, no instance of being banned from watching The Smurfs or listening to The Beatles, and no epileptic episodes of being filled with the Holy Spirit. Those expecting the same kind of humorous yet unsettling look into the lives of America’s evangelical youth as presented in the recent films Hell House and Jesus Camp will instead be met by a floridly written memoir filled with persistent references to indie musicians, literary luminaries, and German philosophers.
While the tale does not evoke with the same wonder and bewilderment of these documentaries, it does give an honest portrait of one young woman’s losing battle to maintain her faith in God while living with human needs and desires. I found myself chuckling at Bauer’s references to the evangelical tendency toward selective amnesia and inept approximations of mainstream rock bands. She adeptly describes these communities in ways that will immediately be picked up by the sufficiently attuned ear:
I stood with everyone else but didn’t sing, and got light-headed from all the sincerity… Now there was no antidote to the stock phrases I had been hearing over the years that had begun to pain me whenever they were uttered… It sounded like effeminate earnestness, even when men spoke. It was a lingo. People picked up the phrases and passed them around like a contagion, which meant that they were perfectly happy to use what was lying about and say what everyone else was saying. There was no reflection on this habit, no idea that God deserved better than clichés.
Saving Herself
Bauer’s two main struggles are with her need for perfection and with the persistent feeling of being out of place in every scene; both are common afflictions for those who have been indoctrinated with the belief that one must fit into the sinless “good Christian” mold in order to be snatched up by God at the End of Days. The result of such indoctrination is that Bauer makes impossible demands of herself. She seeks infallibility from God, her partner, and her friends, and is disappointed to continually discover all are rife with flaw and contradiction; that there is no “right” way to be a Christian or a writer (Bauer’s other passion), a sentiment that goes against her rigid upbringing.
I found myself wondering if Bauer could have maintained her childhood faith if those to whom she went for guidance hadn’t been so inflexible. Instead she turned to the Bible for answers, and as my partner once informed me, the worst way to persuade someone to maintain their Christianity is to encourage them to read the Bible—a thorough reading will only reveal more of the religion’s inconsistencies. To read the Bible is to discover the incongruous humanity in the religion. To read the Bible demands one confront the fact that faith cannot be empirically gained, a slippery slope to agnosticism for evidentiary types.
Bauer presents a collection of life-changing relationships, both platonic and romantic, as she crawls at a snail’s pace toward her departure from the fold. People enter and exit quickly with little indication of where they came from or where they disappeared to. There are brief mentions of a conversation with a schoolyard pal or a love interest at a party. At first I found this disconcerting, but upon reconsideration felt this could be a literary device: Bauer impresses on the reader just how fleeting these encounters had been for her, but the role all actions play in shaping the person we become.
Not that Kind of Girl is a lesson in the ways we drift toward self-discovery and settling into the person we are, which is different than the person we’d imagined we would be. It is an exploration of the undramatic and lackluster ways we shift ourselves, and are shifted by others. At its core, Not that Kind of Girl is a love story—not the kind where Prince Charming rescues the princess, but the kind where the princess stumbles several times, falls over and over again, and eventually figures out how to save herself.







The description of finding the way out of an evangelical environment sounds very much like how things were 3 decades earlier. But things seem so different today. Back then you had to stumble around alone and in the dark trying to find the answer. Now the answers are screaming at you in bright lights. Back then you had Vietnam, a political war where we were balancing the power with the Russians, and our religion was mostly on the sidelines except a few like MLK and Christianity was split across the political spectrum. Now we have the Iraq war, a war against a non-threat with the ultimate goal of stealing oil, and supported by our religion probably because they see rapture potential in more mideast war, and the Christian here are even the most supportive part of the population for using torture. We would never even have started that war in the first place if the Christians hadn't formed their lockstep voting block and elected their president. Separation of church and state previously clouded the issue. Combination of church and state brings everything into focus and you can now leave evangelical Christianity with 100% confidence you are making the right choice.
"...the worst way to persuade someone to maintain their Christianity is to encourage them to read the Bible—a thorough reading will only reveal more of the religion’s inconsistencies. To read the Bible is to discover the incongruous humanity in the religion. To read the Bible demands one confront the fact that faith cannot be empirically gained, a slippery slope to agnosticism for evidentiary types."
Exactly. Never, ever, base faith on the Bible - especially not the "inerrant, infallible Word Of God." Such a thing does not exist.
If it did exist, you wouldn't need faith.
Then it is up to YOU to decide which parts of the Bible are true and which are not. And you are not up to the job.
We can find parts of the Bible that are not true by looking for those that are disproved by modern science. Geology shows contradictions in the account and timeline of creation, and evolution demonstrates life on earth is a branching tree of ancestors, not separately created kinds.
Never trust those evidentiary types! They'll tell you to read labels, ask questions, and not jump to conclusions.
Hearing that was worth the read. Bitc-ing about "cliche's" as faith i.e. mental assent to trite verbal propositions has been a full time hobby for years. Her's was a great way to put it.
evidentiary types
oops. ya kinda slipped on that one. I mean noticing the inconsistencies in the text of the Big Black Bound magic book is a type of evidence isn't it? I could be wrong. Mandy, if I am, please splain it to me.
Why do the atheist fundamentalists like to hang out here? Go clog up some other message board. Atheist evangelism is just as annoying as evangelical or fundamentalist evangelism. If you are here, be here to learn or engage in conversation, not give us your lousy sound bites.
Augh, come on. Your going to wind up sounding like the tribe on the Charlie Danials message board. There are now a grand total of nine, count up nine responses to the piece. "Clog up." Really. And, as noted in the presidential hall of fame, "if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen."
Dixie - I see you guys on just about every post trying to evangelize the religious. What I'm saying is: "this isn't your kitchen." And your evangelizing grows tedious. As I said before - interact substantively with the posts, be here to learn as well as state your views, and don't just give us sound bites.
Augh, come on. Your going to wind up sounding like the tribe on the Charlie Danials message board. There are now a grand total of nine, count up nine responses to the piece. "Clog up." Really. And, as noted in the presidential hall of fame, "if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen. Juicy Couture "
Comments closed
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.