ReligionDispatches.org

Dying for Heaven: Holy Pleasure and Suicide Bombers–Why the Best Qualities of Religion Are Also its Most Dangerous
by Ariel Glucklich
(HarperOne, November 3, 2009)

Writing about suicide bombers is a crowded field, especially since 9/11. Two years ago, Martha Crenshaw, a prominent professor of government at Wesleyan University, wrote a mega-review of the top twelve books on this riveting but complex topic. She concluded her nearly 30-page essay by suggesting that:

Governments should also look to the future, in that the purpose and instigation of suicide attacks might change. Today’s threat stems from the powerful association between jihadist beliefs and suicide tactics, but radical Islamists do not own the method. —Security Studies (January–March 2007)

The new danger, according to Dying for Heaven author Ariel Glucklich, is pleasure. Not everyday frolicsome pleasure, but divinely mediated or holy pleasure, the unrecognized pathology that motivates suicide bombers. The best qualities of religion, according to Glucklich—trust in a life beyond this one, invocation of a source greater than human creativity or beneficence, for instance—are also its most dangerous.

While it may be easy to decode the thesis from a mere glance at the book’s title and subtitle, it’s not quite so easy to accept the premise. Dying for Heaven, released today, is at once conceptually misguided and systemically flawed; psychologizing religion in general and Islam in particular. Having mined myriad, often disparate sources, and writing from a lofty platform, the author is attempting to answer several metaphysical questions with some potentially physical, real-life implications on the ground. Of his book, Glucklich writes on the HarperOne site:

The obvious topic is whether Iran can be deterred from using nuclear weapons against Israel when they finally do acquire them. Can deterrence ever work with an actor who is completely committed to a religious life?

An Indologist by training, Glucklich has written highly acclaimed, prize-winning books that adroitly analyze the Hindu tradition and its mythic claims. He occupies a major academic post (professor of theology at Georgetown) and serves as an advisor to the US defense community as it attempts to cope with asymmetric warfare in the post-9/11 era.

God as Prozac: Religious Peer Pressure on Steroids

“Dying for Heaven is about Iran and The Bomb,” states Glucklich in an author interview. This cosmological policy issue begins on the subatomic level with a reimagining of the role of the pleasure principle. Because pleasure is the central motivating force of the human experience, we are told, “religion has emerged and prospered as an institution in human history because of the way it controls natural pleasures—sex, eating, and money come to mind—and allows them to evolve in response to increasingly complicated situations.” (p.5)

The author then emblazons this thesis with a neologism, or what he claims to be a neologism: hedonics. In this case, religious hedonics, which he calls Prozac. Forget the happy pharmaceuticals, Prozac here is a stand-in for the mechanism by which institutional religion has functioned and shaped behavior for millennia. The Beyond, according to the author, has been misrepresented as the love principle, or the urge to participate in something greater than oneself; metaphysics has turned out to be pharmaceutics.

Since all humans, while prone to seek pleasure, cannot agree on its source, society must be regulated by law. Mystics, however, are anomic: they avoid contracts or duties in order to pursue ‘lawless’ love or charisma as embodied in the spiritual master—the ultimate duper. And here is the real danger: they often project pleasure and love not as individuals but in groups, with the result that “this love—a form of pleasure, in fact—can lead members of such groups to self-annihilate in acts of revolt or martyrdom.” (p.8)

This stream of consciousness does, of course, have a history. There is, for instance, happiness economics—a.k.a. hedonics—which focuses on how the pleasure principle impacts investment strategies and consumer preferences. But the oldest use comes from religious psychology itself when no less a mystic than Timothy Leary coined the term. Back in 1971, when he was still a professor at Harvard, Leary operated a Hedonic psychology laboratory where he postulated and tested his eight circuits of consciousness, all of which could be traced to tantric yoga.

Though neither Leary nor the Harvard Hedonic lab is mentioned in the book, is it mere coincidence that Glucklich himself earned his PhD at Harvard, focusing on, among other things, images and symbols in the phenomenology of dharma?

Humorless Muslims: A Recipe for Terror

It would be easy to dismiss Dying for Heaven as a mere trickster story if only this much were known about the thesis informing this bizarrely casual, yet deeply serious, treatise. But its author is claiming a two-fold explanation and then a prescription. He first lays out a mono-causal explanation of why most people do not understand how the pleasure principle connects to religious faith, “the ways in which pleasure can motivate us while eluding our conscious awareness” (p. 8), before offering a differential explanation of why certain religions are more prone to violence than others, in particular, “why religious suicides are more likely to emerge from Islam than Judaism, and why spiritual devotion is more dangerous than blind observance of religious law.” (p. 7)

The true culprits, now operating below the radar screen of American intelligence and defense department analysts, aren’t strict fundamentalists, but mystics. Not only can the Prozac effect of love be dangerous, but “in some situations the Iranian mullahs, with their Islamic laws, pose far less danger than a lovingly disposed spiritual master, whether Muslim, Jewish, or Hindu.” (p.9) In other words, the book may be about Iran and The Bomb, but the real message is: don’t fixate on nukes when it is mystic who are the real kooks. 

Above all, the red alert on the threat posed by Jewish as well as Muslim and Hindu gurus would seem to undercut the earlier claim that “religious suicides are more likely to emerge from Islam than Judaism.” The justification for an emphasis on the Islamic difference, however, becomes clear in Chapter 7’s warning signs (read: policy prescriptions). Titled “Spiritual Love and the Seeds of Annihilation,” Chapter 7’s warning signs follow the explanation, in the preceding chapter, of why God’s love operates like Glucklich’s Prozac effect. It reverses all current policy, and the academic/think tank logic on which it is based: Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza and elsewhere, while dangerous, are not “self-annihilative.” (Even if Hezbollah has curtailed its suicide bombings, does anyone in American or Israeli intelligence think that they have been reduced as a regional, and possibly transregional threat?)

The real danger, according to Glucklich, is interior: “small scale groups that center on a spiritual master—a Sufi shaykh, for instance—are potentially annihilative”—and thus to be more feared than their Hindu and Jewish counterparts. Why? The logic is serpentine and convoluted. The pillar of any social order is respect for the law, for institutions of public exchange, which Sufi Muslims ignore while Hindu and Jewish groups do not:

Tags: franz rosenthal, green hermeticism, hamza yusuf, happiness economics, harvard, harvard university, hedonics, hindu, humor, islam, islamophobia, laughter, love principle, muslims, pir zia khan, pleasure principle, prozac, robert spencer, sufi, sufism, suicide bombers, terrorism, timothy leary

Related Stories

The Mystic in the Rye: JD Salinger’s Religious Fiction
By Louis A. Ruprecht

RDPulpit: Obama Missed the Hope in State of the Union Address
By Daniel Schultz

Losing Old Gods, Finding Nature
By Bron Taylor