The new year is still fresh upon us, but just like late winter’s crocuses, the Academic Freedom bills are beginning to sprout.
Each year, various conservative state lawmakers across the country flock back from vacation to their new legislative session clutching slightly tweaked versions of these bills. The title “Academic Freedom” sounds noble enough (how could a freedom-loving American oppose such a thing?) but the bills’ basic gist is this: “Evolution is a lie! Evolution is evil! If your children learn we came from monkeys, they will go to hell!!!!!”
This month, Mississippi lawmakers introduced in the House the first anti-evolution bill of 2010. The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Gary Chism, and which has been referred to the House Education Committee, would require lesson plans on evolution to have “proportionately equal instruction from educational materials that present scientifically sound arguments by protagonists and antagonists of the theory of evolution.”
Chism, unsuccessfully sponsored similar anti-evolution legislation in 2009. According to the National Center for Science Education, Chism told the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal last year, “Either you believe in the Genesis story, or you believe that a fish walked on the ground," and adding, "All these molecules didn't come into existence by themselves."
A day after the Mississippi bill was introduced, Missouri lawmakers introduced their own version in the House on Jan. 13, which includes the required teaching of "strengths and weaknesses" of evolution. The bill says:
“Teachers shall be permitted to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of the theory of biological and hypotheses of chemical evolution.”
State Rep. Robert Wayne Cooper (R-District 155), who has been behind a series of failed attempts to pass similar legislation, introduced the bill and has been joined by ten co-sponsors.
As is usually the case with these kinds of sneaky backdoor attacks on science education, the pro-intelligent design Discovery Institute has its fingerprints all over this. Since intelligent design was exposed as a fraudulent marketing campaign in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case, the academic freedom bills have been Discovery’s new strategy for Creationism 3.0.
In 2007, Discovery, along with Motive Marketing, the publicists for the Ben Stein movie Expelled, launched a joint-venture Web site that not only promoted “academic freedom” bills, but provided sample wording for writing the legislation. Stein held press conferences and showings of the movie--which tries to make the argument (poorly) that academic freedom is under attack because science professors are being persecuted for believing in intelligent design--in states where the bills had been introduced.
Expect more of these bills to be introduced in other states. The blog stand up for REAL science has a nifty widget to keep track of all the introduced legislation.
Tags: creationism, education, religion, science
I'm reading conflicting arguments: some say religious fundamentalists are losing ground but other articles seem to say the opposite.
Does anyone know the real stats?
What's wrong with teaching both theories is that, as the President said last night, America must be first.
If we teach our children idiocy (creationism) then our children will be idiots and won't have a chance to compete in the Global Market.
Is that a good enough reason?
Good enough, but not the only reason. Teaching creationism would ultimately undermine Christianity because once Christianity is in science class, it is open to question, and it has no answers. It would take a student who wanted to ask the questions, and there currently might be nobody, but some day a student with intellectual curiosity might come along.
Perhaps creationism should be allowed in the classroom for that would certainly expose its errors very quickly. The problem is that many Christians are so indoctrinated, they are unreasonable and often refuse to look at the facts. Afterall, they are taught faith above reason! How can you argue against that! I read a story about a young Christian man who entered university and discovered the errors of creationism - the shock was too much, he couldn't deal with it and killed himself. Very sad.
It is a troubling situation. The religion wants respect for beliefs that can be proved false. Giving them respect just compounds the problem and in the end there will be more shock for some of them when they face reality. You can't compromise because they aren't looing for truth, they are looking for ways to separate the believers from the non-believers, and that young man was just a casualty.
There will be more tragedies. Where the set of rigid creationist believers meets the set of gun-fetishists and the set of male violent misogyny,and racial/religious hatred there will be tragedy after tragedy.
Buckle your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy ride.
The alterrnative is to throw our hands up and say " dunno, god did it.", which I think is not really an option. The sooner we get away from 2000 year old myths and folklore the better.
Hair Regrowth
Legislators pushing anti-evolution bills in state legislatures seem not only in need of good science education themselves but also some acquaintance with the court rulings that have struck down efforts to impose unscientific teaching on public school students. -- Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Liberty, www.arlinc.org
Comments closed
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.