Should Religion Be Protected from Criticism?
April 13, 2009.

On Thursday, March 26, 2009,

the U.N.'s Human Rights Council approved by a bare majority a proposal

by Muslim nations urging passage of laws around the world to protect

religion from criticism. The proposal, put forth by Pakistan, urges

states to provide "protection against acts of hatred, discrimination,

intimidation, and coercion resulting from defamation of religions and

incitement to religious hatred in general. The proposal is non-binding. 

The reasoning seems to be that

if religions are not criticized or questioned, that the "religionists"

of that particular religion will have no cause to violently protest.

Blackmail pure and simple. 

Now I may not be criticizing

religions per se but I am criticizing how religious adherents of particular

religions seem blind to the greatest moral outrage of the 21st

century: gender inequality.  

Adherents of Islam are shutting

girls' schools, cutting girls' genitals, marrying girls off at 13,

keeping women and girls locked up, "honor" maiming and killing them,

and depriving them access to the full panoply of reproductive health

service.  

Adherents of Catholicism and

of other branches of Christianity are using psychological blackmail

to discourage a healthy attitude about sexuality, denying access to

choices in reproductive health, urging fertility beyond human capacity,

and painting abortion as the greatest crime (all blame on the woman)

even though abortion throughout human history has been ubiquitous across

all cultures.  

Religion can be a positive

force pointing us toward concern for out fellow human beings and respect

for all people and the planet. It can also be a scourge upon the land.

Examples of both types abound.  

Read more »

Comments
Login / Signup Join the conversation

Comments closed

The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.